Jon Stevens wrote: > No. our current solution is to have one .bat and one .sh script. I don't > think that is a problem considering all that we are doing is building up a > classpath and executing the JVM in most cases. True. The current solution works just fine as far as we are setting up CLASSPATH and launch Ant to do the work. Still there are many platforms capable of running Java but not .bat or bash .sh scripts. Perl is much more wide-spread, and it would be nice to have it as the third alternative. Rafal ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Rafal Krzewski
- Re: MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Christopher Elkins
- Re: MS Windows batch files Michael Rimov
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Rafal Krzewski
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Frank Conradie
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Frank Conradie
- [torque] mysql foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] mysql foreign primary keys Jason van Zyl
