Jon Stevens wrote: > > on 9/14/2000 4:31 PM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that the term 'Group' is more general. For Scarab 'Team' sounds great, > > but 'A group of users related to a document' sounds more natural than > > 'A team of users related to a document'. > > > > Rafal > > So, what does the database schema look like? "group" is a reserved keyword. It's implementation independant. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: SecurityService Jon Stevens
- [vote] DB Schema Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [vote] DB Schema John McNally
- Re: [vote] DB Schema Didier Dubois
- Re: SecurityService Daniel L. Rall
- Re: SecurityService Daniel L. Rall
- Re: SecurityService Jon Stevens
- Re: SecurityService Daniel L. Rall
- Re: SecurityService John McNally
- Re: SecurityService Daniel L. Rall
- Re: SecurityService Fedor Karpelevitch
- Re: SecurityService Jon Stevens
- RE: SecurityService Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
- Re: SecurityService Fedor Karpelevitch
- Turbine Installation with Orion Berny Woehrlin
- Re: Turbine Installation with Orion John McNally
