Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> Raphael Luta wrote:
> > We have no problems with the Service infrastructure but a lot of code
> > sits in the CVS that *should* be Turbine services but currently are not
> > and are in the process of being moved as service.
> > During this process, we still need to initialize the components that are not
> > yet services and this is done by overriding the Turbine servlet init() method.
> >
> > When all the components are moved, this init() should be empty and thus
> > we can remove the subclass.
> >
> > The only alternative I see to this process is writing a new service that
> > would only initialize all the other components without providing any real
> > "service" method, but I find this solution much more a perversion of the
> > Turbine service model than the subclass one.
>
> I feel exactly the opposite. For me, writing a temporary wrapper service
> seems
> to be much less intrusive action.
>
> Initializing other subsystems is a very nice 'service' itself, isn't it?
+1
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
