Raphael Luta wrote:
> You don't irritate me at all. I even find quite funny that my arguments
> are all about preserving the purity of the framework whereas yours are
> "do whatever ugly hack you want as long as it doesn't show".
Please excuse me but I think that this discussion isn't taking us
anywhere.
We (I'm speaking for myself and Jon here) believe that Turbine servlet
should *not* be subclassed. It's now declared final and it will stay
this way.
I also showed you a way of solving your (transient) problem in Jetspeed,
that does not create a (potential) problem in Turbine.
I believe that you should rather concentrate on converting Jestspeed
components into Turbine services (the real problem) that elaborating
on what hack is less harmful for the purity of framework.
Regards,
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
