Marcelo Vanzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jon Stevens wrote: > > >> But I got interested in the last one: modifying the connection pool > >> system to have multiple database failover. Is anyone working on that? Or > >> has it already been done? > > +1 Go for it. > > I'll begin to take a look at it this week then. > > In the meantime, is there a reason why DBConnection does not implement > java.sql.Connection? It could be useful in some situations. DBConnection is a *wrapper* for a Connection. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Connection pool (and more) Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Daniel Rall
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection pool (and mo... Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection pool (a... Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection poo... Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection... Jon Stevens
- Re: Re: Connection pool (and m... Daniel Rall
- Re: Re: Connection pool (and more) Bob Anderson
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection pool (and more) Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection pool (and mo... Marcelo Vanzin
- Re: Connection pool (and mo... Rafal Krzewski
- RE: Connection pool (a... Magnús ?ór Torfason
- Re: Connection poo... Rafal Krzewski
- Re: Connection poo... Jon Stevens
- Re: Connection pool (a... Jon Stevens
