Magnús ?ór Torfason wrote:
>
> > This could be easily
> > acomplished by defining a class wrapping around
> > javax.sql.PooledConnection
> > (or some such) that implemented TurbinePooledConnection interface (which
> > would in turn extended java.sql.Connection).
> >
>
> Ok, so what you are suggesting is that the people wanting to use
> javax.sql.PooledConnection would wrap that in a class implementing
> TurbinePooledConnection. Looks like a good idea, provided it would NOT
> require the rest of us to use javax.sql.PooledConnection.
Yeah this is the idea, to make a common wrapper. Compiling the wrapper
will require javax.sql.PooledConnection and thus jdbc 2.0 jar, but
we already have this jar in our lib directory.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
