on 12/27/2000 9:44 AM, "Bob Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the details of your DB connection pool, but I just
> thought I'd offer this consideration: In our custom framework, we decided that
> our db connections should NOT extend
> java.sql.connection, because we didn't want anyone to close a connection. We
> decided that the connection pool should be the only thing responsible for
> closing connections. Individual applications
> should simply request connections from the pool, and return them to the pool.
> If someone wants to go off on their own and do their own special thing, JDBC
> is always available, but we wanted to
> keep our pool clean. ;)
> Food for thought.
>
> Bob
Question:
Why didn't you just use Turbine's pool? :-)
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
