on 1/2/2001 5:33 AM, "Magn�s ?�r Torfason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so what you are suggesting is that the people wanting to use
> javax.sql.PooledConnection would wrap that in a class implementing
> TurbinePooledConnection. Looks like a good idea, provided it would NOT
> require the rest of us to use javax.sql.PooledConnection.
+1
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
