> This could be easily
> acomplished by defining a class wrapping around
> javax.sql.PooledConnection
> (or some such) that implemented TurbinePooledConnection interface (which
> would in turn extended java.sql.Connection).
>
Ok, so what you are suggesting is that the people wanting to use
javax.sql.PooledConnection would wrap that in a class implementing
TurbinePooledConnection. Looks like a good idea, provided it would NOT
require the rest of us to use javax.sql.PooledConnection.
>
> Rafal
>
> --
> Rafal Krzewski
> Senior Internet Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
