on 2/22/01 1:25 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the main reason is broader API compatibility.
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Again, my point is...what exactly does that get us?
If it is simply the ability to use drivers that support rollover, then I
would rather see us just add rollover to Turbine's Pool instead of having to
wait to have it added to all of the drivers (and hope they get it right).
You can broaden this whole discussion into something like EJB's. Should
Turbine implement the EJB specifications to get us "broader API
compatibility"? I think not. :-)
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
