Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 2/22/01 1:25 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think the main reason is broader API compatibility.
> > --
> >
> > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Again, my point is...what exactly does that get us?
No functionality, just a broader range of users. But that's worth a lot.
> You can broaden this whole discussion into something like EJB's. Should
> Turbine implement the EJB specifications to get us "broader API
> compatibility"? I think not. :-)
The pooling has a much narrower scope and doesn't appear to have such
an ungainly interface.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
