Re: ConnectionPool ammendemends: JDBC 2.0 Compatibility &More (2/2)

[Jon Stevens]

on 2/24/01 4:59 AM, "Sean Legassick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Which bit?
> 
> I like that you just close a Connection object and it gets returned to
> the pool with no special coding...

You still have to put it into a finally in order to close() it. There is
nothing gained by doing that and it is also confusing IMHO to do that
because it overloads the meaning of close(). That is bad engineering design
IMHO. 

-jon



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]