Re: ConnectionPool ammendemends: JDBC 2.0 Compatibility &More (2/2)

[Sean Legassick]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:44:50AM -0800, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 2/22/01 9:27 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > The pooling has a much narrower scope and doesn't appear to have such
> > an ungainly interface.
> 
> Actually, it does.

Which bit?

I like that you just close a Connection object and it gets returned to
the pool with no special coding...

-- 
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Ek is 'n man: niks menslik is vreemd vir my nie  
      
      


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]