on 2/26/01 8:15 AM, "Sean Legassick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True. In fact you've pretty much convinced me there's not a whole lot of
> point. I am interested in having the pool make use of all the features
> of a JDBC2 compliant driver on the back end (like surviving DB restarts
> well etc).
>
> However I don't really care personally about the exposed API, because as
> you point out Torque means I never have to use it :-)
>
> So when I get a chance later this week I'll assess Costas's patches from
> this perspective.
>
> --
> Sean Legassick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, write up a summary that explains my reasoning and post it to the xdocs/
directory. :-)
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
