Okay, one big batch reply, simply because I don't like sending four emails in a row.
First, I'm setting the date for the doc sprint as Oct 30. The time I'll be starting is 10am, eastern time (3pm GMT). Plan is for me to be online/available until at least 6pm eastern (11pm GMT). On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:18 AM, werner <[email protected]> wrote: > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/intro/tutorial01/ > > Then select "creating models" and now you would like to search or go to > another page. You have to page up 3 or 4 times or scroll or ... Well, I'll admit to not being overly fond of anything that stays in place while I scroll, but I suppose I can't argue against it. Especially when we add in that, for something like this, it's probably a good idea. On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:20 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Django's site is not readable on my blackberry One of my long term goals is to provide three versions of the docs: HTML, PDF, and ePub. If memory serves, Aldiko is available on Blackberry, and that will read epub. So, as long as I can make that goal a reality, you'll be able to read TG docs on the blackberry. Until that happens, though, I can put blackberry high on the priority list. After all, TG is a tool for web developers to make web applications. Writing a web app on the blackberry is going to be extremely rare (to the point that I'd be surprised if even you are doing it). Relying on having a full browser available is definitely not an arduous requirement to place on someone reading the docs, since they've already got at least one other browser open on a common desktop OS while doing the development work. On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > You can have a sticky sidebar with the Sphinx default template by setting > the stickysidebar option. Unfortunately, there is no such option for the top > and bottom bars, so the top links and bread crumbs move away when scrolling. > Not good. Seens very few docs have sticky navigation, maybe because of > compatibility issues with various browsers. We would probably need to invent > something on our own. My only object to having more floating sections is real estate. As it stands, we're going to have something on the side, taking up screen space. If we add something sticky to the top and/or bottom, we're going to lose more screen real estate. I don't think I'm in favor of that at all. On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is a quick-and-dirty draft of a layout with the discussed changes > (clearly arranged start page and fixed nav bar with full toc tree): > > http://www.turbogears.org/docs/playground/docsprint201010draft1/ Okay, let me just say that my ideas are completely blown away by that. That looks good. And that's quick-and-dirty? Damn, you make me look bad. I might just swipe that as is, and build some page type templates around it. -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
