Sorry for my abruptness earlier. Things have settled to the point that I have done everything I can for work's crisis of the day.
So, I followed the instructions from Christoph, but they didn't quite do everything perfectly. Almost, but not totally. The tags from the 2.0 branch were missing. I got that replaced, and did a reverification of the repository. I even cloned it a separate time using hg. Everything came across: branches, bookmarks, tags. They're all visible in the the sf.net web interface as well. It turns out that hg 1.6.3 was not new enough to do the rebase properly. I had to update to 1.7.3. All in all, it looks good to me, and I'm a lot more comfortable with this release than I am with the prior release of the TG2 repositories in git. What do you all think? Does this look good, and I should continue the same path for the other repositories we need? Or do I need to alter the procedure still a bit? Christoph: I'm not a strong TG1 person. How can I help with getting TG1 migrated to sf.net? -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/peder...@icelus.tzo.com, ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/pedermj022...@hotmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
