I think the sf.net tracker service is better than the hosted app offering primarily because you can't install plugins into that trac, and we're actively developing features for the main tracker.
I work with a large project using it every day, and find it to be pretty flexible and easy to use. --Mark On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark, what do you recommend for bug tracking at SF? The SF tracker or > Trac as hosted app or even something different? Last time I had a look > at Trac on SF, it came only with some basic plugins and did not allow > much customization. Has that been improved? > > -- Christoph > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears Trunk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
