On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 07.03.2011 02:15 schrieb Mark Ramm: >> >> I have no objections to this approach. >> >> As for the TG2 as sf.net location, I'm partial to /p/turbogears2/ but >> can be persuaded by somebody with a strong argument/ > > Ok, so let's follow that plan now. I'm also for using "turbogears1" and > "turbogears2" as project names, and removing "turbogears" because that will > create only confusion. We should also create a top level project > "turbogears3", "orion", "karnak" but obviously we will need to agree on a > name first. I like "Orion", but it can be confused with Apache Orion. >
I would suggest using turbogears3 only if its usage will be similar to TG2 and it is fast to port applications from TG2 to TG3, otherwise I would suggest using a different name to avoid expectations of being able to simply replace an import and see it work from users. Any help needed in moving tickets to allura for TG2? I still have to see how allura works, but it shouldn't be impossible to help for such a simple task -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
