On 6/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have a mandate from our investors to not use code with the LGPL.
That rules out SQLObject. For our current project and TG 0.8 we use a
minimal library that we wrote in-house to replace what we needed to
from SQLObject. Going forward we'd like to adopt sqlalchemy since it is
being actively developed and has an acceptable license. (The MIT
License.)
Does anyone know what the timetable for TG/sqlalchemy 0.2 integration
will be? Is it worth it to work with sqlalchemy 0.1 or has the API
changed enough that it is better to wait?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
