Neil Blakey-Milner schrieb: > On 6/26/07, JeffRo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It sounds like the preferred stack for TG, both now and going forward >> is: >> >> - Genshi templates >> - Tosca widgets >> - Sqlalchemy > > Agreed
+ 1 With the objection that ToscaWidgets needs documentation. The other two projects have excellent documentation themselves, I don't see a great need for TG to duplicate that, we only need to document the integration. But TW has no proper docs yet and it would be a pity to make the same mistake as with TG widgets again by delaying the documentation effort for too long. >> - Routes > > It's definitely my favourite, but I don't think that it's anywhere near > decided. I like the CherryPy dispatch mechanism, it fits my mind. I only wished that rest style urls (/object/id/verb) were easier to implement. >> Where does MochiKit and/or Prototype fit into this picture? > > I think this is still undecided. I know most people probably never > used the MochiKit stuff in TG 1.0. Everybody that uses any of the AJAX-enabled widgets is using it. > If there aren't already, I imagine > there will be ToscaWidgets for all the major JS libraries soon. It's > then a matter of picking the best of the breed. Yes, but the framework (TG) should still decide which library to use for implementing core JS-enabled widgets. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
