On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Christopher Arndt wrote:
> > Neil Blakey-Milner schrieb: >> On 6/26/07, JeffRo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It sounds like the preferred stack for TG, both now and going >>> forward >>> is: >>> >>> - Genshi templates >>> - Tosca widgets >>> - Sqlalchemy >> >> Agreed > > + 1 > > With the objection that ToscaWidgets needs documentation. The other > two > projects have excellent documentation themselves, I don't see a great > need for TG to duplicate that, we only need to document the > integration. > But TW has no proper docs yet and it would be a pity to make the same > mistake as with TG widgets again by delaying the documentation effort > for too long. I agree. Now that I'm planning to make a first beta release soon (after I polish up the API to interface with the hosting framework) documentation is a must. My plan is to release a WidgetBrowser for TW along with the beta, similar to TG's, but with with an extra tabs for the widget's docstrings (which documents params too), widget's source code and template. The browser will also be available at toscawidgets.org so documentation can be browsed online along with the "living" widgets. BTW, I'm looking for help in the visual design of the site and browser. If anyone want's to help in this are I'd really appreciate it (and users too, my photoshop skills suck! ;) Alberto --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
