On Tue, 2007-26-06 at 23:04 +0200, Christopher Arndt wrote: > Neil Blakey-Milner schrieb: > > On 6/26/07, JeffRo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It sounds like the preferred stack for TG, both now and going forward > >> is: > >> > >> - Genshi templates > >> - Tosca widgets > >> - Sqlalchemy > > > > Agreed > > + 1 > > With the objection that ToscaWidgets needs documentation. The other two > projects have excellent documentation themselves, I don't see a great > need for TG to duplicate that, we only need to document the integration. > But TW has no proper docs yet and it would be a pity to make the same > mistake as with TG widgets again by delaying the documentation effort > for too long.
Yes, very true. I think it would be very damaging to TG to worsen the documentation status by switching out preferred components before they are thoroughly documented, both in a user manual style and reference style. > > >> - Routes > > > > It's definitely my favourite, but I don't think that it's anywhere near > > decided. > > I like the CherryPy dispatch mechanism, it fits my mind. I only wished > that rest style urls (/object/id/verb) were easier to implement. I would hope we could easily make that choice on a per project basis, much the way one can now do with CP3. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
