Christopher Arndt a écrit : > Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb: > >> And I agree with Paul that the TG leaders ought to send a very strong >> signal now regarding their decision and avoid leaving the community >> discuss ad libitum for no reason. This is the time for people like >> Alberto and the other BDFLs to speak out and be clear. >> > > Who started the whole of idea of SQLAlchemy being replaced by Storm > anyway? I don't know of any plans by the TG team to do so, present or in > the future. I think we're happy with SQAlchemy. >
I'm not saying that there is such plan. But there hasn't been any clear and strong message from the TG team saying that it would not happen either way, leaving the community discussing the advantages Storm has over SA which will ultimately lead to someone wanting its support. This is a reasonnable assumption from someone who uses TG but doesn't develop it. The TG story has shown that as soon as a new project was getting some momentum, there was a strong push to use it instead of existing tools. Sometimes it was for the best (SA over SO, Genshi over Kid [1]) but it doesn't mean it's always good to let the community in the hope things could happen in a way the TG team doesn't want to. The TG-users liste has more than 3000 users. The TG-trunk list has less than 300. It's fair to expect people to launch ideas on the main list but not read the second list. - Sylvain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
