On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:57:11 Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > And I agree with Paul that the TG leaders ought to send a very strong > signal now regarding their decision and avoid leaving the community > discuss ad libitum for no reason. This is the time for people like > Alberto and the other BDFLs to speak out and be clear.
I'm no BDFL, but I don't see any logical reason *now* to switch away from a *default* SQL Alchemy setup on TurboGears. There were no tests, there's no code in TG, etc. that has Storm in it. In the future there might be. But we also had SO only, then SO + SA, then SO + SA + (SA + Elixir), then the default being switched, etc. No investiment in time and money for learning / enhancing any tool has been lost. The same happened with Kid, Kid + Genshi, Mako, a miriad of other templating systems, default switch, etc. All the time that I've been working and coding something on TG itself what has been done was choosing defaults and leaving other options available / possible. I believe that this has to be clear. More tools and options for who will be using the default? Probably. But then, we can mix things and use our preferred choice and the default choice. Is having choices and having to add a switch to "tg-admin" all that bad? -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
