On Thursday 12 July 2007 09:09:11 Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > > If you felt that's what I was saying, I need to clarify. I don't think > choice is wrong. TG's philosophy and strength has always been that > possibility of a choice but I do indeed believe there is a need for a > clear default that the dev team will support. Why? Because that makes > thet default reliable to the eyes of a customer (and I mean customer not > simple user).
I completely agree with you on that. > In the end I couldn't care less of which tool TG uses but if I were to > use it for my job I would want to be sure that things won't change all > over again every year or so. Consitency and reliability are as important > as the tool itself. If changes are well documented and I can keep on using my choices over the time, then I don't mind if the default changes. I agree that having it there is really important, but I disagree that it has to be the default choice all the time. > I'm happy you guys have confirmed you had no intention of dropping SA, I > didn't really think you would do anyway, but at least the intent is > clear to everyone and people know they can rely on SA for being > supported correctly. That's all that matters. Yep. :-) As a SO user, I can say SA is great. ;-) I have projects with both. I don't want to be forced to rewrite any of those, so I perfectly understand your feeling here. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
