+1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use. On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki. Venkata Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in line > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this. > > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content out of > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a > lot more > pleasant to look and feel. > > Thanks > > - Venkat > > > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Dan Murphy wrote: >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make >> > sense >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the >> website >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is likely >> to >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet. >> > >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java >> SCA" >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki page. >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles >> > down (or >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to >> > the web >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to >> > others who >> > are already committers... >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE >> >> website: >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our >> >> website is >> >> in svn which covers that. >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not >> "fancy" >> >> organized >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?" >> >> >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly? >> >> >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release >> >> information and downloads, etc. >> >> >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is >> right >> >> now >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We >> should >> >> not >> >> move it until we have a good replacement. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi Kelvin, >> >> > >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki - >> >> > CWIKI. Infact >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for >> SCA M3, >> >> some >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place >> >> there. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > >> >> > - Venkat >> >> > >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where >> we are >> >> with >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content? >> >> > > >> >> > > Kelvin. >> >> > > >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Hi, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Thanks, >> >> > > > Raymond >> >> > > > >> >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > To: <[email protected]> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > <snip> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some >> >> guidances >> >> > for >> >> > > > >> cases >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered >> users) or >> >> > > > >> documentation >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file). >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered >> >> user. >> >> > We >> >> > > > > want >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more >> likely to >> >> > happen >> >> > > if >> >> > > > > we >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in >> >> patches for >> >> > the >> >> > > > > wiki >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we >> all can >> >> > > monitor >> >> > > > > the >> >> > > > > changes? >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > ...ant >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode, >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket... >> >> The whole list is there: >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
