I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked
in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
line
> with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
>
> I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content
out of
> that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> lot more
> pleasant to look and feel.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Dan Murphy wrote:
>> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to
make
>> > sense
>> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
>> website
>> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
likely
>> to
>> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
>> >
>> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy
Java
>> SCA"
>> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
page.
>> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
>> > down (or
>> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to
help
>> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
>> > the web
>> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
>> > others who
>> > are already committers...
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
>> >> website:
>> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
our
>> >> website is
>> >> in svn which covers that.
>> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
>> "fancy"
>> >> organized
>> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>> >>
>> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>> >>
>> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move
all
>> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs,
release
>> >> information and downloads, etc.
>> >>
>> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
>> right
>> >> now
>> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
>> should
>> >> not
>> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Kelvin,
>> >> >
>> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> >> > CWIKI. Infact
>> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
>> SCA M3,
>> >> some
>> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found
place
>> >> there.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > - Venkat
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
>> we are
>> >> with
>> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Kelvin.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Hi,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered
users.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks,
>> >> > > > Raymond
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > > > To: <[email protected]>
>> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > <snip>
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
>> >> guidances
>> >> > for
>> >> > > > >> cases
>> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
>> users) or
>> >> > > > >> documentation
>> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
registered
>> >> user.
>> >> > We
>> >> > > > > want
>> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
>> likely to
>> >> > happen
>> >> > > if
>> >> > > > > we
>> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
>> >> patches for
>> >> > the
>> >> > > > > wiki
>> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
>> all can
>> >> > > monitor
>> >> > > > > the
>> >> > > > > changes?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > ...ant
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
>> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
>> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
>>
>> The whole list is there:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
