Hi, Yes, what Luciano is suggesting here makes sense to me as well.
Thanks - Venkat On 4/4/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastien wrote: > I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is >probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then. Should we leave like 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, and only add M3 or alpha1 when we branch/tag for release, together with the removal of SNAPSHOT ? This would make trunk always with same version id, right ? On 4/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > Raymond Feng wrote: > > Forgot to ask one question: > > > > We have inconsistent version ids for artifacts in the trunk, do you > > plan to reconcile them? If so, what should the version id look like? I > > propose that we use something like 1.0-incubating-alpha1-SNAPSHOT to > > reflect the fact that we're working toward a 1.0 release. > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > Yes I plan to reconcile them, like this: > > > > >> - Version of our modules will be specified once in java/sca/pom.xml, > >> child poms don't need specify a version as they get it from their > parent > >> > > I was initially thinking about 1.0-incubating-M3-SNAPSHOT, but alpha1 is > probably better. I'll start with alpha1 then. > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
