Thanks! Its great to hear you're doing this. A src zip attached to a jira is
fine if that's easiest for you, a diff patch is better for updating existing
code but as this is mostly new code/modules a zip is likely easiest. It
doesn't have to be perfect to submit the patch, its always tempting to
polish things first but in some respects its better to start submitting
rough code early before its perfected and incrementally improve it within
the Tuscany SVN. Worst case is if it turns into a really significant
contribution we might need a formal software grant to accept it, unlikely in
this case so just post it when ever you're comfortable.
...ant
On 6/23/07, Bill Barnhill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've made some progress using host embedded, and have that running within
Felix. I have a barebones module that is also a bundle, but all the
regular
modules are in one big Tuscany bundle right now. It's been shelved the
past
few weeks due to transitioning to a new project, but now I'm settled in on
my new task I should be able to make time to work on Tuscany again.
I'd like to execute the following tasks before I submit a patch with an
attached src zip (that is right way, yes?):
.. Refactor to a) make it easier to use with Eclipse, Oscar; b) clean up
code
.. My test coverage is at about 60%, and I'd like to get it up above 85%
before submitting
.. Write tool that takes an already packaged Tuscany module in a jar and
injects necessary components to make it an OSGI bundle as well. I have
design notes, a collaboration diagram, and a couple of sequence diagrams,
but no code yet, so that may take a while
Given the above and my schedule I'd like to allow plenty of time, so
figure
1st patch submit NLT 7/30.
On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill Barnhill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
SCA-OSGi
> > integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, using
> > OSGi as
> > an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an extension
> > mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry capabilities.
> >
> > I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and Graham
> > have
> > been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
> > contrib
> > with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
> > implementation)
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
> from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package them
> as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded that
> will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
> jar/bundle dependency management.
>
> Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do you
> have code that we can look at?
>
> Any questions or issues that we can help with?
>
> On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on supporting
> the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the SCA
> assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Community is a verb, increase your Communitivity today!
Visit us at http://Communitivity.com";
=Bill.Barnhill, President
Communitivity, Inc.
