Hi Stephan, This looks good since it looks like tools for SCA will get more focus :) I have a question.
You mention "the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a set of tools for SCA developers and SCA users". What is the difference between SCA developer and SCA user in this context? Haleh On 4/2/08, Stéphane Drapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all, > > The proposal is a 3 pages document describing the scope/intent of the > proposed project. > > The outline is: > 1. Introduction: the proposition of the transformation of the STP/SCA > component into a sub-project named SCA Tools under the top level project > STP. > 2. Background: presentation of STP + presentation of the existing STP/SCA > component. > 3. Description: the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a set of > tools for SCA developers and SCA users. Another goal is also to link this > sub-project with other components of STP (Service Creation, Policy Editor) > 4. Proposed components: SCA Domain Model (SCA meta model), SCA Composite > Designer, SCA Composite Editors (tree, xml and form), SCA Integration > (integration with other STP components) > 5. Relationship with Other Eclipse Projects: STP, EMF, GMF, M2M, ... > 6. Organization: this sub-project will take place under the top level > project STP. > 7. A list of proposed initial committers. > 8. Code Contribution: the Eclipse STP/SCA component will be the initial > code. > 9. Interested parties: this section lists companies and communities that > support the creation of the project. They don't take other engagements. > 10. Tentative Plan for 2008 and 2009. > > Our goal is to identify formally the scope of the tools that we develop > around SCA. The new status will provide some advantages. > - I think that the SCA tools will be more visible in the Eclipse community > if we are identified as a sub-project. > - From the users point of view, it will not change anything. > - Concerning us, we should be more formal: clear roadmap, new features > described/discussed first in bugzilla, ... > - It will also present some advantages for Obeo by becoming a sub-project > leader. > > In the near future all STP components will become STP sub-projects. To > summarize, all of this is purely administrative. > I will send you the proposal document ASAP. > If you have any questions, don't hesitate. > > Haleh, yesterday I sent you more information about the SCA Composite > Designer on the thread named "[Website] - Tooling for Java SCA". You can > add > it on the web page. Tell me if you need more/different information. > My post describes what version of Tuscany can be used. I also introduce a > tutorial that I made. This tutorial is based on the SCA designer and > Tuscany > 1.1. > > Best regards, > > Stéphane Drapeau > Obeo > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:05 AM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Stephane, > > > > Welcome to Tuscany. How will changing the status of STP SCA from a > > component > > to a sub project change its future development and focus? > > > > Tuscany community had asked about tools for SCA and because of that I > > recently added a website page [1] to collect more information about > > available open source tools. I added a link to STP there. It would be > > great > > if you could provide more content about what is available and what > version > > of Tuscany it works with. > > > > [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/java-sca-tools.html > > > > > > Haleh > > > > On 4/1/08, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Stéphane Drapeau wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm Stéphane Drapeau from Obeo. I work on tools for SCA and I lead > the > > > > Eclipse SCA component which is a component of the STP project [1]. > > > > Currently, I'm writing a proposal to change the status of the STP > SCA > > * > > > > component* to STP/SCA Tools *sub project*. > > > > I would like know if I can refer Tuscany community as interested > party > > > of > > > > our proposal. It's purely administrative. > > > > Jean Sebastien told me that the Tuscany community must vote on this > > > issue. > > > > So the discussion is open ;) > > > > > > > > Thanks very much. > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > Stéphane Drapeau > > > > Obeo > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: http://www.eclipse.org/stp/sca/index.php > > > > > > > > > > Hi Stephane, > > > > > > Thanks for posting here, it'll enable the whole Tuscany community to > get > > > involved in the discussion around your SCA editor proposal. > > > > > > Can you tell us a bit more about the proposal? do you have an outline? > > > > > > Also can you help us understand what it means to be listed under > > > "interested parties" in such a proposal? > > > > > > Any questions or thoughts from others on the list? > > > -- > > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
