On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Jim Ellwanger <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2009, at 7:22 PM, Jon Delfin wrote: >> >>> I was wondering about what Kevin said about the VCR knowing a >>> protected DVD shouldn't be copied. Isn't that because the DVD has a >>> code included in its audio or video signal? So it's not that the VCR >>> is reaching out to the DVD player, but that the DVD player is sending >>> out a block? >> It's because the video on the DVD is encoded in such a way that the DVD >> player (and the TV) can handle the signal fine, but the VCR can't. >> >> Copy-protection on prerecorded VHS tapes worked similarly: the VCR could >> deal with it upon playback, but it would "confuse" a VCR that's trying to >> record it. > > My fault for attempting an analogy, as all analogies are imperfect. > All I was saying was that there is a signal being sent from one device > to another device via the coax which indicates power to a monitor.
So when the TV is off, the *lack* of signal coming from it registers on the DVR? There must be some circuitry in the TV I'm unaware of then. Just seems counterintuitive that SIGNAL IN on the TV should have any kind of output. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
