On Dec 8, 2:12 pm, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > I would love to see Dave get to > the point where he mostly has on guests that he really cares about > (which I guess is a big part of my original motivation with this > thread - why does Dave, my favorite talk show host - have to swallow > so many shallow and trivial guests that he clearly is not interested > in?).
I think a few years ago this would have been possible, but it also would have meant a parade of race car drivers, washed-up comedians, and obscure authors and "experts," none of whom would have meant (IMHO) for interesting television or decent ratings. Now that the game has changed over at TTS and Dave is getting betting ratings than Conan, there's not a chance CBS or Dave would give in to those impulses. So, if it means another two panels with Kate Hudson, that's what we get. (That said, I thought Anna Kendrick was surprisingly good last night -- but then, Dave had really enjoyed the movie [as did I] and had some interest in her. --Dave Sikula -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
