Dave Sikula <[email protected]> wrote: > I could see where the stereotyping might offend some, but do other > sitcoms really deal with nuanced characterization? I thought it was > meh overall, but certainly more enjoyable than "Parks and Rec," which > strikes me as 30 minutes of people yelling "Aren't we funny?" in my face.
The Guinness people called and "more enjoyable than 'Parks and Rec'" does qualify as the lowest a bar has been set in the history of television comedy commentary. This breaks the old record holder, "more beloved than 'Emily's Reasons Why Not'". Kudos. -- Ed Dravecky III http://www.fencon.org/ -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
