I wanted to mention an interesting side note to this.

I used to have an 8 1/2 foot dish that had support legs that were 
mounted 1/3 of the way in from the edge of the dish.

When I took that dish apart many years ago and leayed the supports 
next to the supports for the 5 foot dish, they were exactly the same 
size.

I'm guessing in an effort to save money in manufacturing and in parts 
storage, they made these 2 dishes use the same suppoprt legs.

Maybe this will help.

Thanks everyone

Bill





--- In [email protected], "ocsrc1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The dish is 59" wide and 10" deep.
> 
> Hope this helps
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Geraldo Paiva" <loures@> wrote:
> >
> > Considering the attachments is being stripped away by Yahoo,  
> please  see the two dimensions I need: dia of dish and depth of 
dish.
> > 
> > 
> > !------------------ dia of dish ------------------!
> > ......................................................  ----
> >    .......................!.....................
> >         ..................!..............              HOW DEEP 
IS 
> DISH
> >               ............!.........
> >                       ....!....                         -----
> > 
> > 
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Richard A. Keirstead 
> >   To: [email protected] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:36 PM
> >   Subject: Re: [TVRO] Re: Need help with measurement on 5 foot 
dish 
> support arms
> > 
> > 
> >   Yahoo Groups strips away all attachments. You will need to send 
> the 
> >   sketches direct to the other person instead of via Groups.
> >   RAK
> > 
> >   Geraldo Paiva wrote:
> > 
> >   > I tryed three times to send the sketch. Certainly, 
Yahoogroups 
> is 
> >   > blocking the attached sketch, I see.
> >   >
> >   > You have already furnished the distanCe between holes of 
> feedhorn ring 
> >   > (5.3/4"). Ring deep 1'. OK. tHe opening of the feedhorn 
extends 
> down 
> >   > 3/4" from the bottom of the ring. OK.
> >   >
> >   > Are missing
> >   >
> >   > DIAM
> >   > <------------------------------------------------------> -----
--
> >   > . . !
> >   > . . !
> >   > . . ! DEPTH
> >   > . . !
> >   > . . !
> >   > . -------
> >   >
> >   > Loures
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   > 
> >   >
> >   > 
> >   >
> > 
> > 
> >    
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>


Reply via email to