I have no problems debating with you, if you can keep your facts
straight. Or rather, if you bother getting the facts in the first
place.

Dewald

On Aug 11, 2:09 pm, TFT Media <tftmedia1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I never said that your system does unfollow.  I point out that
> tweetlater does bulk auto follow and bulk auto return follow, and you
> do so using Twitter's follow limits as a guidepost.  That's fine.  But
> I thought it a bit funny how you then write "Amen" when someone said
> that if Twitter published how many you could unfollow in a day that
> the "naughties" would go -1 on that.  It seems to me that's pretty
> close to what you're doing with your bulk auto follow feature.
>
> For you to categorically state, as you apparently do, that unfollow is
> churn, while things like your auto follow are not, is just silly.  If
> I was to use your return follow feature and follow everyone who
> follows me first, I am probably going to end up with a bunch of
> spammers.  But apparently if I then choose to weed out those spammers
> then it is THAT which is the churn?
>
> I think there is far more nuance and sophistication (or at least I
> hope so) with Twitter's suspension system then to view only one side
> of the equation as the culprit in suspensions.
>
> On Aug 11, 4:42 am, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 11, 3:11 am, TFT Media <tftmedia1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > For its auto-follow, tweetlater.com specifically states: "[w]e have
> > > limits in place to ensure that your daily following remains well
> > > within the limits imposed by Twitter."  So you are presumably touching
> > > the rate limit then going back -1, -2, -3, or whatever.
>
> > You pulled that snippet from my feature that finds potential new
> > friends based on user-selected keywords. That snippet simply means
> > that the user can pause that feature when her account reaches the
> > point where she would not be able to follow more people anyway. And
> > no, my system absolutely does NOT then unfollow to "make room for
> > more".
>
> > Here is what I very publicly said about bulk unfollow:
>
> >http://bit.ly/JM3as
>
> > Dewald

Reply via email to