Someone on a tread once said, "Do you want free business advice: don't revolve you business plan around twitter."
Twitter is free. I'm happy to trade small downtime/performance for something free. That's my 2-cents. - @robertbanh On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Duane Roelands<duane.roela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > " what is more concerning is that it appears > that Twitter just blanketly suspended several of our accounts and our > users accounts that had any tweets posted recently from our > application." > > Is it possible that these customers of yours had their accounts > suspended for activity that had nothing to do with your application? > The fact that they are your users doesn't mean that they are -only- > your users. Nor does it mean that their suspensions are related to > your application. > > On Aug 20, 9:52 am, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sorry, I was thinking with Basic Auth in mind with my previous >> replies. >> >> Logically, OAuth should work differently. I think the idea is that you >> shouldn't be able to make any API calls from the app, if the Twitter >> account from where you registered your application is suspended. >> Meaning, a suspension would be an effective blackout of your app. I >> don't know if that's the way Twitter intended it or implemented it. I >> have not yet added OAuth to my site, so I don't have in-depth >> knowledge of it. >> >> Dewald >> >> On Aug 20, 10:03 am, AccountingSoftwareGuy <virga.rob...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Oauth
