> I think that's the point. They can always just do a manual "re"tweet of a
> tweet.

Of course. That brings us back to the whole question of what purpose the new
retweet system serves if the old manual system will still suffice ;-)

-- 
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * [email protected]
-- The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken Thompson -------------------------

Reply via email to