Yeah I just saw that, they're sticking to there guns.
On Oct 8, 6:24 pm, Duane Roelands <[email protected]> wrote: > I read it, and I was horrified. So, I logged into IRC and found two > members of the OneForty development team. I asked them to remove my > application from the directory. > > They refused. > > OneForty is not a developer-friendly platform. > > On Oct 8, 7:44 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > wow, somehow managed to totally miss that thread... thanks! > > > On Oct 8, 6:07 pm, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's another thread herehttp://bit.ly/Owfvdwherethedeveloper > > > contract also raised some eyebrows. > > > > Dewald > > > > On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There has been a lot of buzz around OneForty.com and what it will mean > > > > for all of us Twitter app developers. However, some of the things in > > > > their developer contract (that you have to agree to in order to claim > > > > your application on their side) gave us (Squeejee) pause after we > > > > decided to read the fine print. > > > > > Please see read the contract for yourself (http://oneforty.com/terms/ > > > > publisher_contract), see our blog post with our concerns (http:// > > > > squeejee.com/blog/2009/10/08/questions-for-oneforty) and leave your > > > > comments! > > > > > Laura Fitton, the founder of oneforty.com, has been very receptive and > > > > wants to engage in open dialogue about the contract. Please add to the > > > > discussion!
