Jim, I am extremely intrigued to know how you figured out from that message exactly what you had to change in your application to come in compliance.
On Feb 16, 5:37 pm, Jim Fulford <j...@fulford.me> wrote: > Well 5 days later, I finaly got a response from Twitter. Posted > below. I'm going to spend the few minutes required to make my app > compliant and see if and when it gets turned back on..... > to be continued.....'' > > On Feb 16, 3:49 pm, PJB <pjbmancun...@gmail.com> wrote: > ________________________________________ > > truebe, Feb 16 10:52 am (PST): > Hi, > We apologize for the inconvenience, but on review of your application > it appears that it breaks our Automation Rules and Best Practices > (http://help.twitter.com/forums/10711/entries/76915). Specifically, it > facilitates automated tools which allow users to spam and violate our > user rules (http://help.twitter.com/forums/26257/entries/18311). It's > best for both our users and your users if your application follows the > rules, so please make the necessary changes to bring your application > into compliance and we will reconsider your suspension. > Let us know if you have any questions! > Brian > API Support
