I completely agree.

Tom


On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:45 AM, "Papa.Coen" <papa.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> To all them TWITTER devs:
> 
> I have some issues with asking Twitter users for FULL control of their
> account. Currently I only want to reply and (re)tweet on their behalf.
> But with an accepted authorization I can do everything with their
> account. There's also no way of making clear my intentions on the
> twitter authorization page. Of course, I could do this up front, but I
> expect the user to start reading only when twitter asks him/her to
> accept or decline authorization.
> 
> So I'd like to propose 2 additions to either OAuth or a Twitter OAuth
> extension:
> - The possibility to ask for (by the app) and grant (by the user) a
> more fine grained level of authorization (more than just read/write
> only)
> - The possibility to insert a (short) description of the intended
> usage, perhaps taken from the app registration from within twitter.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> -- 
> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> Change your membership to this group: 
> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en

Reply via email to