Hi, On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fastream Technologies wrote: > >> Anyway this server is violating RFC2616 !!! > >> 9.4 HEAD > >> The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT > >> return a message-body in the response. > >> > >> Note the "MUST NOT"!! > > > > But the server is Apache and as I wrote before we need to TOLERATE it > > just like we do for IE bugs. > > It is already tolerated, but the server remains buggy! > My first guess was nonsense, dumping the bytes with WireShark shows > clearly that when the subsequent GET doesn't return body data the > component works perfectly since the SERVER sends a chunk size of "0" > octets and no further body data. > WireShark log: http://www.duodata.de//misc/delphi/ics/Packets.cap
I do not have wireshark installed. Please send me cleartext logs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >> Also, did you note how they spell Connection? > >> it's "Cneonction: close" :) > > > > Secondly, this is/should also be tolerated by the component I believe. > > I don't think so, how far should that go where does it end? > Do you realy want to check each header line for possible typos? Connection is either close or ka. It is easy. I saw other application developers making typos as well. Anyway, I sent an email to the web master about these but do not expect a reply anytime soon. Regards, SZ > > -- > Arno Garrels > > > -- -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
