Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maurizio Lotauro wrote: > > Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...] > > Only to clarify :-) > > My was not a critic to CG. This kind of changes certainly will have > > some side effects, but, we say, it is the minor of the harm, or it is > > a necessary harm. > > It depends very much on your code. > At least it 'forces' developers to write cleaner code ;-) > And I must admit that I appreciate this educational side effect :) I fullyagree with you :-) > >> Though > >> this is a strong feature it also means that any code that used > >> strings as binary buffer, or assumed 1 byte = 1 char did no longer > >> work :( > >> And ICS assumed that rather frequently ;-) > > > > I think (and fear ;) that it is not the only one. > > That is IMO the major one. I mean that ICS is not the only one. Bye, Maurizio. ---------------------------------------------------- This mail has been sent using Alpikom webmail system http://www.alpikom.it -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be