Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> > Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

[...]

> > Only to clarify :-)
> > My was not a critic to CG. This kind of changes certainly will have
> > some side effects, but, we say, it is the minor of the harm, or it is
> > a necessary harm.
> 
> It depends very much on your code.
> At least it 'forces' developers to write cleaner code ;-)
> And I must admit that I appreciate this educational side effect :)

I fullyagree with you :-)

> >> Though
> >> this is a strong feature it also means that any code that used
> >> strings as binary buffer, or assumed 1 byte = 1 char did no longer
> >> work :( 
> >> And ICS assumed that rather frequently ;-)
> > 
> > I think (and fear ;) that it is not the only one.
> 
> That is IMO the major one.

I mean that ICS is not the only one.


Bye, Maurizio.

----------------------------------------------------
This mail has been sent using Alpikom webmail system
http://www.alpikom.it

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to