Arno Garrels wrote:
> Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> It's debatable whether a failed FEAT
>> command should be ignored or reported, but I agree it's now backward
>> compatible with v6 or v7 prior to this year.
> If FEAT failed it is the same as if there were no features so IMO
> it should not trigger an error.

Of course only when called internally in one of the HighLevel methods.

Arno Garrels
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Visit our website at

Reply via email to