Arno Garrels wrote:
> Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> It's debatable whether a failed FEAT
>> command should be ignored or reported, but I agree it's now backward
>> compatible with v6 or v7 prior to this year.
> If FEAT failed it is the same as if there were no features so IMO
> it should not trigger an error.
Of course only when called internally in one of the HighLevel methods.
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be