Hello On 16/02/2010 10:00, P.H. wrote: > Hello, > >>> Could it be that the string resulting from a proc rule isn't split? >> Definitely there is a problem here. >> [...] >> I have filled a report on the tracker: >> http://code.google.com/p/txt2tags/issues/detail?id=25 >> >> Please feel free to add and comment on it, >> > There isn't much to add to your report... > > > Here is a quick and dirty (??) patch. No promise, but it seems to works > for me and it doesn't seem to break anything.* > Reading the python regex documentation page, I came across the re.MULTILINE directive, which address exactly our problem I think. So a patch could also be this one-liner === modified file 'txt2tags' --- txt2tags 2010-03-02 07:19:59 +0000 +++ txt2tags 2010-03-02 07:26:01 +0000 @@ -4347,7 +4347,7 @@ if filters: for i in xrange(len(filters)): patt,repl = filters[i] - try: rgx = re.compile(patt) + try: rgx = re.compile(patt,re.MULTILINE) except: Error("%s: '%s'"%(errmsg, patt)) filters[i] = (rgx,repl) return filters
> 38 tests from the test suite fail, but this is exactly like the > official svn version of txt2tags. I haven't looked more into it... You were lucky, I got quite the reverse Totals: 160 tests (38 ok / 122 failed) > Is that important? As it seems these errors are also standing for the official version, the only thing I can say is that Michel would probably have to start his SoC project by fixing the unit tests ;-) Regards, Emmanuel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ txt2tags-list mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list
