Hello On 03/03/2010 10:11, P.H. wrote:
So it didn't solve all the problems. > > In the end, I am not sure this is a smaller patch that the initial one; > and I feel that trying to do some matching on multilines for some (and > not all) tags will be a nightmare. > Much better to split the lines when they are introduced by filters... > You are probably right. Moreover, introducing re.MULTILINE might have some side effects like enabling multi-lines scope in some circonstances and not in other. Eventhough txt2tags is not expected to have multi-line scope, it could reveal confusing. So let's keep the patch you proposed. >> > 38 tests from the test suite fail, but this is exactly like the >> > official svn version of txt2tags. I haven't looked more into it... >> You were lucky, I got quite the reverse >> Totals: 160 tests (38 ok / 122 failed) >> > Strange, I do get 122 OK and 38 failed... > Oh Oh. How is the test suite working when there are multiple versions? Seems I didn't have testing for the right one... Emmanuel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ txt2tags-list mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list
