On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 08:45:43AM +0200, Bastien Curutchet wrote: > OMAP4 support is present but there isn't any board using it. > > Add minimal support for the Variscite OMAP4-SoM (debug console + boot > from SD card). > Use the ti/omap/omap4-var-stk-om44 device-tree from the Linux kernel. The > real representation of the SoM's hardware is located in > ti/omap/omap4-var-som-om44.dtsi included in it. > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet <[email protected]> [snip] > diff --git a/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS > b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..802059ea521 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +ARM OMAP4 VARISCITE VAR-SOM-OM44 MODULE > +M: Bastien Curutchet <[email protected]> > +S: Maintained > +F: board/variscite/omap4_var_som > +F: include/configs/omap4_var_som.h > +F: configs/omap4_var_som_defconfig
So this could all be caught with: N: omap4_var_som Which is my way of moving to the next topic, omap4 needs a maintainer too, if we're bringing it back. [snip] > diff --git a/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h b/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..fa916cc71d2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ > +/* > + * (C) Copyright 2010 > + * Texas Instruments Incorporated. > + * Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> This part isn't right, is it? > + * Configuration settings for the TI OMAP4 Variscite SOM board. > + * See ti_omap4_common.h for OMAP4 common part > + */ > + > +#ifndef __CONFIG_VAR_SOM_H > +#define __CONFIG_VAR_SOM_H > + > +#include <configs/ti_omap4_common.h> Can we just set SYS_CONFIG_NAME or so to ti_omap4_common and drop this file? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
