Hi Tom
On 5/19/26 4:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 08:45:43AM +0200, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
OMAP4 support is present but there isn't any board using it.
Add minimal support for the Variscite OMAP4-SoM (debug console + boot
from SD card).
Use the ti/omap/omap4-var-stk-om44 device-tree from the Linux kernel. The
real representation of the SoM's hardware is located in
ti/omap/omap4-var-som-om44.dtsi included in it.
Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet <[email protected]>
[snip]
diff --git a/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS
b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..802059ea521
--- /dev/null
+++ b/board/variscite/omap4_var_som/MAINTAINERS
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+ARM OMAP4 VARISCITE VAR-SOM-OM44 MODULE
+M: Bastien Curutchet <[email protected]>
+S: Maintained
+F: board/variscite/omap4_var_som
+F: include/configs/omap4_var_som.h
+F: configs/omap4_var_som_defconfig
So this could all be caught with:
N: omap4_var_som
Ok
Which is my way of moving to the next topic, omap4 needs a maintainer
too, if we're bringing it back.
Ok, I can also add myself in the omap4 maintainer then.
[snip]
diff --git a/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h b/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fa916cc71d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/configs/omap4_var_som.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2010
+ * Texas Instruments Incorporated.
+ * Steve Sakoman <[email protected]>
This part isn't right, is it?
True, I'll remove it.
+ * Configuration settings for the TI OMAP4 Variscite SOM board.
+ * See ti_omap4_common.h for OMAP4 common part
+ */
+
+#ifndef __CONFIG_VAR_SOM_H
+#define __CONFIG_VAR_SOM_H
+
+#include <configs/ti_omap4_common.h>
Can we just set SYS_CONFIG_NAME or so to ti_omap4_common and drop this
file? Thanks!
Indeed, I'll do it in next iteration.
Best regards,
Bastien
