Sorry Tony. It was a beautiful day in the Pacific Northwest and I couldn't help reminding us all of the generalized useless nature of Congressional edicts. :-)
When the dust settles I suspect it'll be like the year 2000 problem; by 2004 noone can remember it. :-) (gota add those smileys) As always, Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Gravagno > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] [OT] Sarbanes-Oxley > > > My friend, we rarely disagree, even on these points. I've made no such > assumptions about rationality, actual vs intended effects, nor the > competence of those sponsoring laws. I only stated the possible > effect the > new laws will have on people worldwide. Are you responding to someone > else's comments?? If my intent wasn't clear, please let me know. Nothing > worse than being admonished for thinking something that never occurred to > you. :) > > Tony > > Bill H. wrote: > > > Tony: > > You make large assumptions: > > 1) Congressional lawmaking is rational > > 2) Laws passed don't have the opposite effect from intended > > 3) Those sponsoring laws have a clue what they're doing. > > When it comes to Congress, the less they do the better. :-) > > Tony Gravagno wrote nothing of the sort: > [snip - go check] > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
