http://databases.about.com/od/sqlserver/a/mssql_editions.htm

SQL Server 2008 Workgroup per processor (not per core) = $3899

That's unlimited client access. Where are the UniData licensing options
that really compete with that for small business? (as you pointed out U2
on a single connection pool, single user is not really going to cut it)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug
Sent: Sunday, 6 February 2011 10:44 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

Hi Bill:

Maybe there is a SQL Service license for 3,500.  Maybe you can run U2 on
a single connection pool with a single U2 user .  We know that both
statements are not true.

The base software they purchased is 595.00 per user on SQL Server plus a
multitude of other options.  How much they forward to Microsoft for SQL
Server I don't know.  What I do know is they are using SQL version 2005.
So they have limited maintenance on the database and have missed many
releases, bug fixes, and security patches.  And you need those on SQL
Server.

Because they were not running on our Web CRM and Distribution software
for the last 3 years we lost maintenance and enhancement revenue, which
we did not plow back into the product.  So, it did have an impact.  We
had to fund that development internally.

We spent hundreds of hours changing our interface to make it look
relevant and new.  We added additional options of skins.  We spent
countless hours improving our speed between Apache Tomcat and the client
(browser).  We added grid to grid drag and drop, so they can move data
from one multi-value field to another.  We added the ability to make
different layouts of the
grids such as 3 horizontal or 3 vertical.   We added contextual menus to
grids as well.

These may not seem much but when we went in and demonstrated the
software they had already seen years before, they did not recognized it.
We got the oh wow factor and we closed the sale.  

As they say in the restaurant business: "Presentation is everything".
We need to learn that in the U2 world as well.

Regards,
Doug
www.u2logic.com
"Eclipse based tool developer for U2"


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 2:48 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

Doug:

I believe what you're saying.  You ought to believe many of us who point
out that we're familiar with partners and competitors who put their
enterprise .NET applications for small businesses on an SQL Server
machine with a single CPU license for $3,500.  They run the application
on an IIS server and pay nothing for connectivity because it's all part
of the MS framework.
Clearly this is a different scenario from you and has a serious impact
on smaller businesses attempting to "host" their application, although
it appears to have no impact on your business.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug said the following on 2/4/2011 3:49 PM:
> HI Bill:
>
> We are replacing a CRM and Distribution system running on Microsoft 
> SQL Server that cost 10 times what Unidata does.  The irony of this 
> replacement is they are still running Unidata and could never get this

> software to running the way their current system does after 3 years.
> We are migrating them to the Web using our U2WebLink middleware in 
> just 2
months.
>
> Regards,
> Doug
> www.u2logic.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill 
> Haskett
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:07 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?
>
> Doug:
>
> Let me point out an alternative perspective.  An ISV's job is to sell 
> our applications.  If we can't compete in our business marketplaces, 
> we need to make adjustments or look at alternatives.  Competition 
> mostly means we need to offer a product that benefits our customers at

> a price that is usually less than our competitors.  From my 
> perspective, your statement that you pay "much higher rates for Oracle

> and
Microsoft"
> databases doesn't apply to my experiences.  In fact, a number of our 
> competitors use Microsoft technology and have much lower deployment 
> costs in the small business environment than we do.  I'm only saying 
> my experiences differ from yours on this point, which is critical to 
> our
business.
>
> Bill
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
###########################################################################################
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.
###########################################################################################
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to