This is what I'm asking, and not seeing.... Tony wants to know if there is interest to decide if it warants development time/cost
however, unless someone can give examples of a real usage where we say...WOW, we NEEED that it wouldn't be worth the expense to develop. It might not be that there is no interest, it just might be that no one has given the masses a really good reason to want to use that method. Which was what I was saying, if people who are using it currently with their UV (or non UV) give some examples of how it has helped their bottom line, or at least quieted the Pointy hair boss! George > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:u2-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:22 PM > To: U2 Users List > Subject: Re: [U2] Pondering recent thread on compact framework > > And now for a dose of reality... Consider the problem with Sony > servers > in the gaming environment. How in the world is a smaller MV company > supposed to keep up with all of this technology blowing in the wind? > This technology de'jour mentality puts us all out of business, because > there's no way we can develop all of these interfaces because someone > has to pay for all of this - and that someone is us! Neither is there > any way we can afford to use 3rd party GUI people, as a simple > incomplete web-site costs $3-5K, and then it takes many hours to > integrate their work into the technology we use. > > Once again, there are some specific and excellent uses for something > like an android phone. I, personally, have a very difficult time > reading the screen and navigating around, because navigation speed is > directly correlated to use and I use the device very little - I do have > life! :-) > > Just a thought. :-) > > Bill > _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
